Oelm
Auto-translated
The funniest thing isn't that they're trying to portray Rebellius as a maphacker. It's much funnier that they're trying to make him out to be a clueless maphacker.
Let's just put ourselves in the shoes of a player who's ready to cheat on the map to achieve victory. How would he act if he's playing to win (and a mentally sound maphacker always plays to win)? No matter how hard he tries, the cheater will have to play from the very beginning. Just jumping ahead to day 14+ is unlikely to guarantee a victory. He needs to have a good feel for the game from the very first days. Even if he plays without drawing too much attention. That's how Eddie and Vitalik played. That's why their win rate was so high. RBV approached the game without taking it seriously, which is why he often lost. Therefore, it's logical to assume that the investigation should focus on the saves from the first or second week. To assume that the player played fairly for the first 10-20 days, relying on skill, and then made a jump on the fourth week, knowing the map in advance, is only possible if you're delusional.
Can I assume that the "JUDGES:D" of the tournament didn't think of this? No. I don't think they're idiots. Therefore, there's an ulterior motive behind Rebellius's disqualification. What that motive is isn't very clear. At the very least, Blackknight's reputation is such that 80% of players don't want to play against him. And it seems that certain perceptions about the other players will also have to be re-evaluated.
Let's just put ourselves in the shoes of a player who's ready to cheat on the map to achieve victory. How would he act if he's playing to win (and a mentally sound maphacker always plays to win)? No matter how hard he tries, the cheater will have to play from the very beginning. Just jumping ahead to day 14+ is unlikely to guarantee a victory. He needs to have a good feel for the game from the very first days. Even if he plays without drawing too much attention. That's how Eddie and Vitalik played. That's why their win rate was so high. RBV approached the game without taking it seriously, which is why he often lost. Therefore, it's logical to assume that the investigation should focus on the saves from the first or second week. To assume that the player played fairly for the first 10-20 days, relying on skill, and then made a jump on the fourth week, knowing the map in advance, is only possible if you're delusional.
Can I assume that the "JUDGES:D" of the tournament didn't think of this? No. I don't think they're idiots. Therefore, there's an ulterior motive behind Rebellius's disqualification. What that motive is isn't very clear. At the very least, Blackknight's reputation is such that 80% of players don't want to play against him. And it seems that certain perceptions about the other players will also have to be re-evaluated.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.