Academy of Sciences of Heroesland

But in this case, we're talking about scientific achievements that lead to immortality, right?

Yes. Are you hinting at a simple logical chain connecting science and immortality, from which we derive the identity (money or science) = (money or immortality)?
>Not everyone thinks like you.
Read this sentence fifty times.
I'll give you an example.
A person would choose money over science, but immortality over money. In this case, they should still choose science – it will lead to immortality. This sentence – "it will lead to immortality" – contains information that is inherently unreliable. Because science may invent this body and successfully transplant the person's brain into it, or it may not invent it and not transplant it. If the person in question is more inclined towards the latter, then they will still choose money rather than science, which, in their opinion, will lead to immortality in a hundred years or so. Do you understand?
>Not everyone thinks like you.
Another fifty. Just in case.

Of course, I'm saying that I'm not interested in your opinions about money or religion.

You're not interested in my opinions? Then why are you reading them?

So we're both trolling. But you started trolling, so you're the main troll.

What? I still haven't seen any arguments showing that I'm trolling.