You folks are steering the topic in the wrong direction.
Javdet :
1 You contradict yourself in your post — first you say it looks like maphack, then when you found out who the author is, you started dodging.
2 If you're so sure you can do it to any player, then bring at least 5 identical clips to the studio.
As for all the saves, you can of course look through everything, but that's like looking beyond the frame of a painting, and if you look at everything indiscriminately, you might miss the main point...

1 I'm not dodging. I still hold the same opinion about the 1st save, the other two are forced. As for Pandoras... well, I dunno.. if you ALWAYS take Pandoras with the main stack, that doesn't mean this approach is the only correct one. Purely theoretically, imagine there are comrades who, out of principle, don't take them with the main..
I'll repeat again — you need to look at the MAXIMUM number of games to identify the regularity of blind jumps, skill choices, who takes Pandoras, and even which direction they run at a fork..
2 Too lazy.
In any game, you have to make choices, and in principle, every successful move in the right direction can already be interpreted as a hack — the main thing is to sort them properly. From my own last game: when I saw how the opponent was eating Dragon Utopias that I considered mine, I make an illogical move — through a Pandora, I go into a Dragon Utopia with a weak army. In the Pandora is all the land, which is very convenient. And literally a day later, I pick up Alertness from the Scholar in the last slot))) If you take the first moment as a hack and forget about the second, and gather another five similar ones, then there you have the full picture.
In short, here's my point. We need to analyze the percentage of correct vs incorrect decisions. 60/40 and even 70/30 is normal. But if it's higher — it's worth thinking about