Second, I am not against the current system, but for its reconstruction in the form of 111+111 or 112 or 113.
Third, I am against a pure up to 112.
Variability in restarts makes the game more interesting in terms of tactics. I'm not talking about chocolate-seekers, but I mean the right to defend one's draft.
Added after 19 minutes
Reducing restarts is normal, but eliminating them altogether will have a damn drastic effect on player relationships. Let's take an example: say 1 restart is allowed, and all other restarts only by block (we remove Jebus Cross and 8xm8a). Situations where both take 111 will naturally be very frequent, since we are playing SoD, BUT disputes over blocks will increase, when we have to call in judges to check whether it's a block or not. This will lead to friction and arguments, from which we have practically freed ourselves thanks to the current system! For what reason, for example, after taking 111, do I then have to listen that I supposedly have a block, it needs to be checked, and judges are nowhere to be seen, pointless arguments start, instead of a possible 111, which is subjectively taken automatically in a block. The fewer restarts, the more headaches about reviewing the map for the appearance of a block!
And where the greater time loss is, even a blind man can tell...
I join 112 in total. 113 provokes seeking chocolate. I've even come across the opinion - if the red opponent didn't take 111, take your own without a doubt =-o