I'll sign up: 584985121
I have a suggestion to determine the strongest player based on the number of victories against strong players, i.e., taking into account their rating. For example, one player might have a 20-18 record playing against strong opponents, while another has a 20-17 record playing against recent newcomers. Perhaps that would be fairer...
Yes, logically it's better that way, but in practice, many controversial situations might arise.
Therefore, "Anarchy" is the way to go. :)
And if anyone tries to grief, they'll get this: :smile18: