Skip to content

Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

User Avatar
#61
Auto-translated
AlexeyPank;56893
No, equality won't help the situation. The problem is that the winner among 5 participants isn't to blame for having so few competitors. He might have beaten 50, but there simply aren't that many. Therefore, punishing him would be unfair.
If the winner always receives 50 grail gems, where is the punishment?

Added 3 minutes later
AlexeyPank;56893
Therefore, a different scoring system should be implemented if the number of participants doesn't reach the minimum quota. I suggest creating a kind of reserve prize fund for such cases.
Although, there is something to it. We can think about it and propose some option.
Твой дом там, где твоё сердце.
Все люди - братья, но в каждом из нас спит волк.