The last 2 words are blasphemy; there is no one above Him, God is love and if someone loves, it means God is within them (not to be confused with passion) and at the end of earthly life you will stand before Him, and wondering then whether life on earth or there was more important will be too late. The body dies, not the soul.
Please read this site so you can understand my questions to you. I am not forcing them upon you, but it would be incorrect to answer without knowing what I am basing them on: http://www.truechristianity.info/don...eve_in_god.php
Then perhaps you will understand me, and I would be happy to read whatever you suggest to me.
A father for a son, a husband for a wife, a teacher for a student — is above God.
Max, this is not blasphemy:
God is the original perfect personality; He resides in the heart of every living being (we don't even control our own bodies; we only want to speak, go somewhere, move, we want food to be digested — the stomach is a highly complex chemical reactor in which same-complex biochemical processes occur that we know nothing about at all, but all these processes, the mechanics of which we do not understand, happen as soon as we want them to; we want to move our hand and it moves, we want to speak and we speak, but do we really know which muscles go where with what effort, in what sequence and how they must move so that the hand rises? What nerve impulses, from where, to where and at what speed must they travel for certain processes in the body to occur? At what speed, at what angle, with what periodicity must the tongue and larynx move just to say something? We don't even think about it, but nevertheless all these complex processes happen as soon as we want them to — God completely controls our body in accordance with our desires and karma), He possesses 6 main assets: beauty (He is the most attractive personality), wealth (all the riches of the world belong to Him), fame (the source of any talent in any person is this original perfect personality), strength (He is the strength of the strong), knowledge (He is the original source of all knowledge) and renunciation (and at the same time He is also the most renounced), He is the Greatest Personality,
A father, husband, teacher are representatives of God for a son, wife, student respectively; none of them are God and none are above Him, but they should be treated as God (son to father, wife to husband, student to teacher)
A father specifically for a son is above God, a husband for a wife, a teacher for a student — meaning that they should be treated as God, and when God sees such an attitude He is pleased with that person, and when God is pleased, He will not remain in debt.
Moreover, He is the most perfect servant. "There is someone who has fulfilled the desires of living beings since time immemorial".
Desires are the main aspect of a human; God resides not only in the heart of every living being but also in every atom — He sanctions any strongest desire of the soul, regardless of whether it is good or bad. Before this, through various sources and methods, He warns about the consequences. But gripped by longing, a living being strives for their coveted desires, plans, goals, like a long-time drug addict for a dose.
Did you all just @go crazy or what?
Is it true that spring has such an effect?
Well done; instead of a bucket of shit, only two lines. At this rate, in maybe 25 years, you might write something good (without malice and aggression, arrogant sarcasm — there is no dignity in that),
And as for the fact that you don't see my posts, it may actually be a good thing; they are of no use to you.
Practice shows that, as a rule, guys who are tough online
are nothing more than cowards in reality.
You allow yourself to behave rudely and boorishly with aggression and malice only because something falls outside the boundaries of your own ideas, outside the boundaries of your worldview, only because you don't like something;
this says that you are simply uneducated. And the shit you poured on me in private messages, without any basis or reason, your unmotivated aggression and malice, speaks for you (censorship, equivalent — speaks for itself).
A man who seriously considers himself smarter than a woman is already a finished loser.
Ariputra, sorry, but in my opinion, you're talking nonsense.
By the way, if a man drops 10 sticks, does he lose 4 liters? Maybe we should prescribe milk for hazardous work?
Well, I think you're talking nonsense, and with enviable consistency.
This was me trying to answer you by taking your point of view, your convenient position.
Every person, oelm, looks at the world, the people surrounding them, the reality surrounding them through the prism of their own mind; such is a person's mind, such is their perception, meaning everyone thinks of another as they are themselves. If something in me irritates you, then it is a sure sign that this exists in you too, otherwise it wouldn't irritate you. We all mirror each other. Before editing, you wrote there that you see reflection and self-pity in me, but why do you think you saw specifically that among everything else? :rolleyes:
If a man drops 10 sticks, then with great probability he is just a little liar; well, I think you won't be offended, I asked purely theoretically, not meaning yourself.
What you are saying reminds me very much of the style of some Discovery documentary. Also, I don't rule out that you attend (or watch recordings of) lectures that preach these thoughts.
Why, when I became acquainted with these ideas: about 7 mental shells, etheric bodies, souls etc., and so on, why did I look at all this skeptically? And most people, I think, feel the same way. Imho, because the consciousness immediately rejects this information as knowingly false, but why? Because the source is "heard it from someone" (OBS). All claims refer to newspapers, movies and some authorities. It seems more to me that periodically the media makes an epic dump into the masses; some manage to separate the wheat from the chaff, while others put on a cassock and go preach.
A person gets what they believe in. If it really seems that after sex a man becomes stupider, so be it!
What is wrong with a person, in accordance with their beliefs, going to a Christian church, a Muslim mosque, a temple of Vedic culture or a Buddhist temple? I write about what interests me; I am not forcing my understanding of the sacred scriptures or any other understanding upon you, and I am not insulting you. If you disagree — please.
The esoteric nature of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, and Vedic literature speaks of the existence of mental shells, etheric bodies, and the soul — the most living entity; even modern materialistic science recognizes this, having come to this conclusion experimentally (for example, there is an experiment with weighing the subtle body, whose established weight within the experiment was 16 grams, etc.). But we don't; we don't believe in anything, and we are skeptical of weights that contradict our own ideas, simply because we are proud, that's all.
You think that most people think exactly as you do because everyone thinks of another as they are themselves, looking at the world through the prism of their own mind.
Further, you assume (meaning you definitely don't know), but one way or another assert that consciousness immediately rejects this information as knowingly false.
Consciousness, Reason may reject something if it does not correspond to its current state, its current ideas with which a person identifies; that is, if some knowledge, information, assertion does not correspond to our own current ideas (which we, due to pride, consider the only correct ones), then naturally any knowledge that does not correspond to our "knowingly correct" ideas, we consider false and knowingly so.
But to consider something knowingly false just because it doesn't correspond to our own "knowingly correct" ideas is, to put it mildly, not reasonable.
By the way, the word "заведомо" (knowingly) that you use carries the root — "veda". The word veda or vedas literally translates from Sanskrit as — knowledge, and the prefix "za-" (beyond/behind) indicates that knowingly correct information is information whose correctness follows from the "Vedas" — Vedic literature; accordingly, knowingly false is information whose falsity also follows from the "Vedas".
The source of what I am talking about is by no means OBS, movies, newspapers, etc.; the source is Vedic literature:
__________________________________
According to materialistic scientists (who came to this conclusion through carbon analysis), the oldest literature on earth is Vedic literature (which contains information about physics, chemistry, mathematics, medicine, atomic energy, etc., and all spheres of human life); for example, Einstein took his theory of relativity from the Vedas, records of this remained in his biography; all modern rocket technology was also taken from there: evidence has been preserved in temples of Vedic culture that Hitler bought a work such as — Vimanika Shastra — a description of flying apparatuses for crazy money, and through Wernher von Braun implemented one of the simplest flying apparatuses from it — the modern rocket; not long ago, modern scientists, as a result of research on cow dung, came to the conclusion that it is a powerful antiseptic; this was written in one of the sections of the Vedas 5 thousand years ago; Christ from age 13 to 30 traveled through modern India studying Vedic literature, on the basis of which he created Christian culture; evidence of this remains in the form of records by servants of that time in temples of Jagannath Puri, Navadvipa Maypur and other cities; Ayurvedic medicine is successfully used today in the treatment of a huge number of diseases; 5 thousand years ago, the atomic and subatomic levels were described there, elementary particles that were discovered by modern science not long ago, the structure of the solar system with parameters that correspond to experimental conclusions of modern science, etc. all this directly or indirectly says that this literature is not mistaken
___________________________________
A source that matches one-to-one a huge number of modern scientific discoveries (the part where women become smarter from sex does not match), could it be non-authoritative?
Another question is that my understanding of information from Vedic literature, the Bible, the Quran and so on may be far from the truth. But the sacred scriptures themselves are not mistaken.
On what basis do you conclude that you managed to separate the wheat from the chaff, only on the basis of whether it corresponds to your own ideas?
Everything is correct: a person gets what they believe in, but what is faith?
Faith is complete conviction in something based on knowledge; faith devoid of knowledge turns into sentimentalism or fanaticism; knowledge devoid of faith (conviction) — philosophical speculation.
Answer the question: why do men in all countries live 10-15 years less than women on average?
Simply denying something without figuring out the situation, without trying to analyze it, study it, denying only because it does not correspond to my own ideas is already not reasonable, and you say that sex has no effect on the mind and other psycho-physical parameters of the gross and subtle bodies of a man.
