Forum

It feels like the task isn't to understand how things really are, but to prove to each other that I'm smart and you're a fool, that I understand everything better than you do in every possible way :(

And when you went to take a piss, did you also lose half a liter of blood? If you had to recover for a week after every time, we'd all be dead long ago))

This remark of yours shows that you first try to refute, and only then figure things out. Statistics say that in all countries, men die 10-15 years earlier than women. If sex is so harmless, then why such a difference in life expectancy? (and work has nothing to do with it; women currently work no less, but live longer),

You shouldn't believe some frigid feminists who want to put men down in perverted ways. Comparing the intelligence of a woman and a man is pointless. A woman's mind is directed towards fulfilling 2 goals - to give birth to a child and to make a man her slave for life. The rest they couldn't care less about. How many great historical female figures can you remember?

You ask how many great women there are? And what do you mean by greatness - fame, notoriety, outstanding achievements in some field? A woman's greatness lies in being a caring mother, a faithful and obedient wife. A woman's reason is expressed in humility. The more obedient a wife is, the more reasonable she is.

Criticism and praise are two sides of the same coin - attachment,
and a person is attached only to what they enjoy (regardless of whether it's bad or good), meaning you are attached to a woman as a source of sensual pleasures, but if they are so bad from all sides, then what did you find in them? Doesn't that mean that not all of them are as you wrote? :)

Your criticism suggests that primarily you relate to a woman as a source of sensual pleasures, but a woman - first and foremost is someone's mother (besides your own wife, of course), and should be treated with respect as a mother ideally, even if she is a feminist (in the sense that there should be no familiarity).

But your criticism is also not without foundation; in modern society, a woman behaves incorrectly due to degradation (improper upbringing), but women have degraded only because there are "no" worthy men who would protect their morality. Men have degraded, stopped protecting women (instead starting to view them only as a source of pleasure), which is why women began to defend themselves, play the role of men, and lost their femininity (female character qualities). Such a woman begins to behave rudely with a man, which in turn sets him against all women in a similar way. These are the roots of such a critical attitude towards women.

It is the duty of a well-bred woman to surrender to a man, to learn to be a good wife and mother, then she will be happy.

For a woman - the source of happiness is the closest possible relationship with her husband and children.

For a Man - the source of happiness is fulfilling his own duty.

So, if a righteous man has 3 children, he fucked only 3 times in his life?)) The Lord said "Be fruitful and multiply," meaning fuck as much as you want. When you contradict your desires, you contradict the desire of the Lord, from which you still won't escape. Because the Lord is in each of us, and we are in Him. And His ways are inscrutable. If most people are constantly fucking and having fun, then that's what the Lord wants, and there's nothing wrong with it.

If he had sex only 3 times, it means he is able to control his lust, and he has higher values and tastes; it doesn't mean he is stupid and deprives himself of so much pleasure, we are just not capable of that, our main value is sex - coarse or subtle (in the form of striving for power, fame, and wealth).

Sex is nectar only at the beginning; in the end - fatigue and disappointment (don't believe me, ask someone over 50).

Just because a person wants something does not in any way mean that God wants it (following this logic, one could assume that if a person wants to rape or kill someone, then God wants it too?), God simply does not encroach upon the free will and desires of a living being; if God did not give a living being the opportunity to realize even its most terrible (immoral) desires, then freedom would have no value. A person has every right to break all of God's laws, but has no right to refuse the punishment for breaking those laws. God says (through holy scriptures, through relatives who have already stepped on the same rake many times) don't do this, don't do this, don't, but if we don't understand and still want to do it, we are given the opportunity, we do it, receive punishment and come to the conclusion that we really shouldn't "do this"; if we still don't come to that conclusion, we will have to step on the same rake again and again.

The Lord said "Be fruitful and multiply" - there is a continuation further within lawful marriage, lawful means that a man takes responsibility for a woman before God, her and his parents, and society for life. In this case, you have the right to have sex with her as much as you want, but it won't save you from the natural consequences. (Having gotten a license and bought a car, you have the right to drive wherever and whenever you want, but wear and tear of parts is inevitable.)

There is nothing wrong with sex in marriage with a lawful wife; moreover, if a young man and a young woman do not immerse themselves headlong in family pleasures, in old age they will regret that they never tried it, and this can become an obstacle to further harmonious development, but all this is true e

If most people are constantly fucking (with whomever they please [sex within lawful marriage is considered]), having fun, raping each other, treating each other cruelly, killing each other, then that's what God wants, and there's nothing wrong with it. Right?

Right, because women have no mind of their own))
Yet another slander from frigid feminists)) They have no mind!
[\QUOTE]

If you say that, it means you either didn't read or didn't want to read the previous messages, or didn't see them, or simply disagree - well, that's your right.
Mind and reason are different structures; it's not correct to compare them to each other,

The oldest literature on earth, according to materialistic scientists (who came to this conclusion through carbon analysis) - is the Vedic literature (which contains information about physics, chemistry, mathematics, medicine, atomic energy, etc., about all spheres of human activity), for example, Einstein took his theory of relativity from the Vedas, records of this remain in his biography; all modern rocketry is also taken from there: in temples of Vedic culture, evidence has been preserved that Hitler bought for crazy money a work such as - Vimanika Shastra - a description of flying vehicles, and through Werner von Braun realized from there one of the simplest flying vehicles - the modern rocket; not long ago, modern scientists, as a result of research on cow dung, came to the conclusion that it is a powerful antiseptic; in one of the sections of the Vedas this was recorded 5 thousand years ago; Christ traveled through modern India from age 13 to 30, studying Vedic literature, on the basis of which he created Christian culture; in the temples of Jagannath Puri, Navadvipa Mayapur and other cities, in the form of records of servants of that time, evidence of this remains, etc. All this directly or indirectly suggests that this literature does not err.

and in particular it states:
that the subtle body of the mind - a woman's mind is developed 6 times stronger, such is the construction of the female subtle body; this is neither good nor bad, but reason (intellect) in a woman is developed 9 times weaker than in a man, meaning that activity which is more related to the functions of the mind is easier for a woman to do, and that related to the functions of reason is correspondingly easier for a man, therefore she should submit (ideally consciously and voluntarily); generally it's incorrect to compare a man and a woman in this regard,

reason and mind are different things (structures); they cannot be compared, it's incorrect, it's the same as comparing an eye and a leg.

Ihtiandr
Generally, all these today's unspoken rules of the mysteries of sex are amusing. Everyone around is fucking, but they're shy to talk about it as a simple realization of their instincts. And if a child suddenly finds out that he came about as a result of inserting a penis into a vagina, that's just terrible, the psyche will be forever damaged, and he'll spend the rest of his life in a mental hospital. In my opinion, when a child is scared all childhood with all this crap and told that under no circumstances should he masturbate, and then he grows up and finds out that in reality everyone around is only fucking, that's when his psyche can actually be damaged and he'll start taking revenge on this world)) So all these clever discussions about sex are empty bullshit, it's better to just enjoy life and fuck everyone you want, rather than fuck your own brains out on this topic)

You're right, sex ("coarse" or "subtle") is the main motive, goal and meaning of almost any activity of the vast majority of people; it's the meaning of human life. If you take away from a person what he lives for, without giving anything in return, his life will lose meaning, he will become angry and irritated; on the other hand, if a person enjoys excessively - he will become greedy and attached. You say that parents tell children one thing but do the opposite themselves; you're right that a child is more inclined to do not what he is told but to follow the example of his parents, but this doesn't mean that these things shouldn't be explained to him; just explain to him at a certain age about the consequences, and try to lead a proper lifestyle yourself. Well, those who don't want to can lead any kind of life; no one, not even God, forbids it, but then you'll have to suffer later.

In a way, you are right. The soul has only two desires - to love and to be loved, to enjoy - that is the nature of the soul, but there are moral (which do not lead to suffering later) and immoral (which subsequently bring suffering, disappointment) pleasures; with a lawful wife, please do it as much as your heart desires; if one is not enough, take 2, 3 lawful wives, as much as you can handle,

but if, as you say, you don't fuck your brain, enjoy life in the sense of fucking everyone you want, that is, lead a promiscuous sexual lifestyle, then later life, meaning karma, will fuck you:

Female chastity is protected by the law of karma:
during life, a person (woman, man) is supposed to receive a certain amount of suffering - "kicks" and happiness - "pats" in accordance with the law of karma, and if there was at least one sexual contact, then half of all her karma from this life passes to the man, meaning he will have to receive half of all her kicks in life in the form of:
venereal diseases, mental disorders, early impotence, and various other sufferings; that is, if you have sex and don't bear responsibility for it in the form of marriage (but if a man takes her as his wife, then she must obey and be grateful at least for the fact that the husband took half of her karma), then according to the law of karma, in due time you will be punished for this; if among those women with whom you want to enjoy family pleasures there are other men's wives, then one such sexual contact can shorten your life by up to 10 years.
"Nothing shortens a man's life as much as courting another man's wife."

Naturally, the question arises: if, according to the law of karma, one is supposed to receive certain sufferings in life, then nothing can be changed? But there is only one moment that cannot be changed - death; everything else can be changed.
In one of the central works of Vedic literature, the Bhagavad Gita, there is a verse:
"As fire completely burns dry wood, so this transcendental knowledge completely burns the reactions of all sinful activities."

Moreover, sexual promiscuity is the original cause - of all crime.
This does not mean that sex should not be had; on the contrary, there just need to be measure and boundaries.