Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
As far as I understand, the only "unacceptable insult" directed at the fairer sex in my post was the phrase "women have no brains."
No, not only that. Imagine yourself on the podium at a scientific conference, with half the audience being women, and read your entire post aloud... I repeat, you are in a public place, not in a male company in a tavern...
And you don't know any historical female figures, that's interesting...
Ihtiandr
And this is already an insult directed directly at me. My quote:
How many great historical female figures can you name?
Did I say that there aren't any?? I just suggested evaluating their number.It seemed to me that way from the context, which is not fully provided. The previous sentences suggested that, in your opinion, there can't be any, because they have different tasks))) I apologize, I didn't mean to offend. But if you know great historical female figures, do you think they also have no brains, like everyone else?))) Because if "women have no brains," then none of them have any? Or do all historical figures, regardless of gender, have no brains?)))