Medals and awards for tournaments.

The "speed and pressure" tournament by Gaudin has just ended (see above). He wanted to award three winners, but we didn't let him, as the meaning is lost in these medals if there are too many.

I just think that the number of awards should be proportional to the number of participants and the status of the tournament.

That's what I'm talking about – there are enough awards in the top three tournaments. But this is only in the top three. When 20 tournaments are held in a year, there are no questions – there will be an overabundance, but when there are at best 4, then it's not so simple.
I won't speculate about Kila; I'm judging solely from my own perspective.