Preparing for the "Van Kanegem" tournament.

I simply proceeded from the assumption that if a tournament isn't popular, winning it shouldn't grant a huge amount of grails. After all, it's one thing to beat three opponents, and another to beat 49. Besides, we haven't had a single tournament yet where the number of people submitting saves was more than 20. So, I didn't take that into account, I admit.
But in that case, additional grails could simply be added for the winner. I just believe it is unfair to grant grails without considering the popularity of the tournament (the number of participants). Victories are different, after all. And winning a tournament with 50 participants is a very great achievement; a corresponding reward can be given.
Moreover, since the "Van Cunningham" tournament will also be experimental, many things need to be checked. Perhaps it should be held first, and then, using the data from it, an analysis of various grail awarding systems can be conducted?