Speed and aggression.

Overall, the coefficients do not reflect the actual balance of power and are essentially a "coin toss." Ideally, an additional game should be played for the prize-winning places.

In my opinion, this is a very sensible idea.
Perhaps we should add a super final to the Swiss system tournament?
In the "Speed and Fury" tournament, there are VERY many technical results, and it is necessary to admit that the tournament table does not fully adequately reflect the real skill of the players.
Perhaps, indeed, we should hold a super final between the participants of the tournament who took 1st and 2nd place?

Super final to two wins. The rules - 1 game per week.
True, it will no longer be quite "Speed...", but the winner will prove that he has "guts" (I apologize to the ladies).
And he won not thanks to some coefficients, but won in an open battle against an equal opponent :)
So to speak, in an adult way :)
Of course, with the MUTUAL consent of both participants in the super final.
I think such a victory will be MUCH MORE significant than a victory based on coefficients :)

What do you say, comrades?
First of all, the opinion of the players who have every chance of taking 1st and 2nd place is taken into account.
The final decision will be made after the completion of the 6th round, after the prize-winners of the tournament are determined.

This is just a suggestion.
It can be tested in the "Speed and Fury" tournament :)
I ask you not to immediately get into a state of exaltation, but simply calmly express your opinion.
But not in the spirit of: "What nonsense?", but calmly say that this is not in the rules of the current tournament and therefore I refuse :)