Do you consider your phrase "about the little king in his little world" to be normal and constructive?
I have neither the desire nor the time for this debate.
I spent a lot of time contacting everyone on ICQ every day.
Just one LSM was enough to drive me crazy.
So I won't be debating.
Later, I also responded in a similar appropriate tone. Unfortunately, you took everything the wrong way and are still trying to sort out personal issues on the forum, which is not good. The job of an organizer is difficult, so the fact that you contacted everyone on ICQ is not worth mentioning.
Don't confuse a commanding tone with indignation.
What do the tournament rules actually say? Take your first post, go to the link to the Swiss system, read its rules, and using the rules described in that link, try to trace the draw and who plays against whom.
THIS WILL NOT WORK, because the "additional rule" (which is not in the rules in the link) comes into effect: awarding 0.5 points "mutually," which is also impossible to guess without an announcement from the judge/organizer. Without knowing this, it is impossible to understand and trace the chain of all rounds. AND MOREOVER, this method (adding 0.5 points) is, according to the link in your first post, UNDESIRABLE for the tournament; the link to your rules says so.
And most importantly, you were told that discussing the rules during the tournament is "bad form."
But you ignored this and are starting to bring everything back to discussing the system.
At least other organizers will hopefully not repeat my mistakes.
If you, as the tournament organizer, still do not see the difference between our positions and believe that my position is not viable, then there is no point in us talking at all. If, however, you have managed to understand the essence of my grievances, then we can continue the discussion on ICQ, if you have something to say to me (which I am always ready to do with anyone).
I suggest leaving forum discussions and personal grievances to yourself, and putting the dialogue about the system in the first place.
But it is worth discussing the Swiss system.
To wasserman:
You can say that this is one of the extreme cases ))). Now the topic has been created specifically for discussion, which is very good.