Skip to content

Batman: Arkham city

User Avatar
#384
Auto-translated
Arandor has no one in the negative roles except Amko.
REALLY?! What a news flash. And are good players playing like that? Or are they just noobs who can't even read?
And he advocates for the execution because Amko is having fun.
What fun? I suggested it and started the execution in the first place.
First, he says he has an amazing role and everyone is doomed without him, then he gets executed and doesn't reveal himself, then when it's time to reveal himself because he's really about to be executed, he backs down, hiding behind his mysterious role. I'll rephrase it as a question: Will an awesome town role scare the town by not revealing itself on the scaffold?
Arandor has no one in the negative roles except Amko. And he advocates for the execution because Amko is having fun. In short, there's no investigation. A great argument in the spirit of "well, Amko is probably Mafia..."
Plus, he loses his vote and disappears. A town role would never let things go on like that.
Another person who plays by the book of rules. If you follow that rule, then more than half of the Mafia would be caught, because they disappear constantly and rarely log in.

And the cop, even though he had two successful night investigations, albeit with a 50/50 chance, would have revealed himself if he had been nominated for execution.
But Hossi says that the Cop wouldn't have revealed himself and shouldn't have done so. Do you have different rulebooks? Lol. WHO TO BELIEVE?!

As for the rest, I don't care.

Be strong. Believe