Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Come on, what grudges? :) You are absolutely right - I'm overcomplicating things... Yes, there are inconsistencies, yes, we've already talked about them, yes, it probably wasn't worth returning to them and delving into these details... Time will tell.
The main thing is that we discussed it so that we don't forget later. Perhaps we will return to the issue of adjusting the formula for calculating ratings for the better. But for this, we need to start calculating the rating somehow and calculate at least a few tournaments, about 3-4, in order to gather some material for discussion.AmberSoler;55647
A trial tournament is a trial tournament... There don't seem to be any fundamental disagreements, everything is going smoothly... :)
No, no :) The tournament is not a trial - it's a real tournament. The awarding of grails is also real. But the calculation of the rating is experimental :) In principle, this is my initiative, I could even do it without consulting the organizers and, after each tournament, post an unofficial rating table in the tournament thread - this is not prohibited. The only thing is that if the tournament organizer also approves this, then the status of this rating calculation is slightly higher, even though it is experimental.