Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The counting committee (that is, myself) reports that at the moment, the two votes cast for the first option will not be counted when the final results are tallied.
1. Dirty_PlayerDirty_Player
I would play with Katherine myself, but only in 2013 :D
If you are planning to start rehabilitation in a year, you should have voted for the second option. In a year, it will no longer be relevant. Either we will ban her, or rehabilitate her, or she will simply lose interest in the game; a year is too long.
2. Katherine
Question - Should Katherine's reports be included in the season?
And Katherine confidently answers:
Yes, I don't mind playing with Katherine.
To promise fair play in the thread and then immediately engage in falsifying the voting results is beyond my comprehension. Or is this an admission that it would be better if I just played with myself?
As for the rest who voted for the first option, submit a report on playing with Katherine in the spring season. Otherwise, what is your answer worth?