Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
25 full games is quite enough, even if a couple or three of them end in failure due to cheating early on, provided, of course, that you are not playing against the same opponent (or two or three).
In this context, naturally, if any additional obligations are introduced for cheaters during a game, then the number can be reduced, but 25 is too few (a person's mindset does not change in seconds – it is a long process). For example, an obligation to write a detailed report, attach save files, some kind of analysis... I was talking about a simple reality - wrote what he wanted (maybe just a brief summary) and that’s it.
200 games is a large number, but it serves as rehabilitation, so it should be large (this is punishment, not leniency). There are people who would advocate for a permanent ban right away, so this isn't harsh enough. Message from Satyr:
I was hoping to see a picture at the link, not another wall of text?
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...