On the other hand, there is an opinion that cheaters should be removed from the list of people living on this earth. That is, even if there is a post in the seasonal game, it should not be taken into account when counting.
In no case should a player be immediately expelled. Forgiveness must definitely be given, but with punishment.
Message from Satyr:
Also, you need to find out if they are beautiful or not. It's not worth rehabilitating ugly ones. IMHO
Damn, I was seriously writing my previous post in the AK topic, went here and just burst out laughing at the post :D +1, but not plus to the meaning of the post.
Guarantors don't help even in a silly situation. Maybe only in church... You need to educate people, not guarantee for them. How can you vouch for a cheater? Is anyone someone's spiritual father?)))
Message from Medium_HP
Rehabilitate in the case of public (in the form of a forum post) admission of guilt and promise to improve.
That's right!
My opinion, which I adhere to not only in the game, but also in life: Everyone deserves a second chance, but not a third. That is, if a person messed up, admitted his guilt and repented, then I see no reason not to give him a second chance. Of course, we are not talking about immediate forgiveness, but there should be a chance to correct himself.
P.S.: I would play with Katerina myself, but only in 2013.
Non-immediate should be long.
And the third deserve it with sincere repentance... Do you know where to send $10 in 2013?
Message from BRitv04ka:
The period after which the black mark can be removed should not be measured by calendar time, but rather by "game progress" - the number of honest and transparent confirmed games (for example, 25). This will add motivation for the cheater to change, and playing fairly will become a habit.
It makes sense, but not 25, but 200, for example (there should really be a long term both as a pure ban and opportunities for him to pass)
Message from Romariogrom:
I think the approach to cheaters needs to be changed somewhat, since cheats also come in different forms, and so do the cheaters themselves.
For example, many remember Loser, so I would give such cheating a permanent ban. Not only did he cheat shamelessly and everything was recorded, but he also denied this fact instead of admitting his guilt.
Or a situation when a cheater didn't really mess up much (let's say he looked at auto-complete in a fun game) and didn't deny the act of cheating or even better confessed to it himself, then you can talk about some terms of rehabilitation.
Message from Romariogrom:
The only thing I don't accept is if the cheater is a girl, especially a beautiful one... and if she gives a topless photo, we will forgive her... and if she lets us touch her, let her cheat.
/topic/at/554927/
Message from Katherine:
I want to express my gratitude to those who are not sending me "ban". I confirm Pit for LM's words about promising fair games. There is indeed an interest in the game.
Good continuation, keep going, that's not enough.
Added 5 minutes ago
And where is the item with the inscription: ban cheaters with the possibility of rehabilitation? In fact, any punishment without the possibility of rehabilitation does not lead to rehabilitation, but neither does impunity.
For a 2-year ban in tournaments, let the seasonal game continue as usual. They agree to play there themselves.