Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Gumilev wrote things that, in my opinion, were not very serious and leaned towards some unhealthy esotericism (these passionaries...). One of the main characteristics of an empire is that it is a MONARCHICAL state. If we deny this, we are simply going against the meaning of this word in the Russian language. In China, there are indeed different ethnic groups, and the difference between them is no less than between the English and the French. And for Gumilev, fitting China into his theory was, I think, a big problem... P.S. - everything said about Gumilev is IMHO.
Added after 34 seconds Ganymed;54500
Read Gumilev
I read it. It's awful, IMHO. Read Marc Bloch instead.
С Пути сбивают мелкие достижения, а изощрённые суждения скрывают смысл слов. И вот уже возникают "правильное" и "неправильное"... - Чжуан-цзы Сильванис
Silvanis
