Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Regarding Turis, many praise her; it's clear that the tactic is very useful at the start. But why her? Valeska seems times more pleasant, and the shooters are also very good at the start. What exactly is this hero loved for—the standard bonus, perhaps, or is the progression somehow better than Valeska's? Sure, one point of speed etc. for cavalry, but that' same small. In general, could you comment on why Turis instead of Valeska—only because of the starting tactic? Or because of the cavalry bonus? If she started with even 1 cavalryman, it would be great, but as it is, I don't quite understand why she's praised compared to Valeska. I'm playing SoD, but I read somewhere that heroes from specializations in some version increase growth, but overall the question is specifically about SoD.