Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The idea of holding such a tournament is not bad in itself, but if one of the goals is to
Minimize the time spent on the game. Judging by the name, the template should be played faster than others.
, then this template is clearly not suitable. The format of blitz tournaments has already been invented some time ago – take, for example, the tournaments on sk2tv and the versions of templates that are played there (balance, skirmish, and 2v2, adjusted). But if you want to try a new template at 160%, then speed-2 would be more suitable.
Even in the case of a loss, the opponent can (but is not obliged) to surrender only when the opponent captures their starting city.
This point will simply prolong the game, and there are usually not many chances left after a loss. And if you want to hold a tournament in the shortest possible time, it is better to play only to 1 victory. And still, 1 subjective restart should be added (even the best players play with it).