Skip to content

God or evolution?

User Avatar
#66
Auto-translated
I support the theory of evolution because, out of all the proposed theories, it is the most logical. Yes, there are still a huge number of questions and inconsistencies in it, but this only means that some link in the long chain is missing from human understanding and cannot complete the full picture. The question was raised here about the fact that there is no transitional form between humans and monkeys. The counter-question arises: "What did you expect?" As mentioned above, various remains of "ancient" humans are found: Homo habilis, Homo erectus, etc. But again, it is necessary to take into account that modern Homo sapiens is a biosocial being, the level of development of which largely depends on the environment in which it grew up. If you take any non-herd animal, it is easy to say that it is a complete being, a separate biological species, individuals of which can survive independently and are practically completely similar to each other (individuality has not been canceled). But if you take a person in the same relation, then you can see a very big difference here. A person who grew up outside of society will not be a complete person. He will descend to the previous stage of development of his species, not having the baggage of knowledge that has accumulated over millennia by members of his kind.