Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
"This is a very complex question. Should we introduce a separate coefficient for each tournament? How should it be determined? How can it be guessed in advance, before registration? Should reports from, for example, the Novice tournament also be valued higher? Should reports from the group stage of a major tournament be worth more when seeding players into brackets than a regular season report?"
I think we need to try it out; we'll find suitable coefficients through trial and error.
When creating a tournament topic, we should give the topic author the ability to set a coefficient from 1 to 3. The coefficient could depend either on the importance of the tournament or the number of participants. For example, a Novice group stage could be 1, and the final pool could be 1.5. Jeb could be 1.5 for the first round and for the loser's bracket, and 2.5 for the winner's bracket. Favorites could be 2 and 3. FB (Final Battle) could be 2.5 and 3. The qualifier for FB could be 1.5 and 2. Of course, these numbers are open for discussion.