I applaud this person.
In every game, I hear from one dozen players about another dozen that "they are not playing the same way as in that game," but there is almost never any sensible argumentation. What smart thoughts and what analytics "about nothing"? I have clearly explained my position - the maniac needs to be executed, no more, no less.
First of all - counterarguments to the attack.
I really don't want to do this, but I have no other choice, because God forbid someone silences you. I am just a commissioner. Monu killed her because he believed that she, in her attempts to expose my role, revealed herself to the mafia. Therefore, throughout the day, I justify the commissioner's actions, it's a mistake, but who doesn't make them, in the end?
Then - taking advantage of the fact that the city trusts you more, taking over the role from your victim.
Bravo, Tox, you still harmed the city before your death.
A little sarcasm.
A request to the doctor: heal me tonight. The doctor and the commissioner are the strongest city roles, capable of turning the game in another direction at any moment, which is why they are priority roles for both the maniac and the mafia. The only difference is that they don't know about you, but I am now in plain sight.
And protection from the serum!
Just excellent. Without sarcasm, irony, and the like.
I would like to learn to play exactly like that.
You know what's the funniest thing? It will work.
You will execute me, my role will not be revealed, and then Reinhardt will simply point you to the targets.
He can even point to those who are really peaceful in order to whitewash himself, or he can betray his teammates.
But at the same time, he will definitely whitewash a couple of his partners and betray several peaceful players.
Besides, if Rimpel is not on his team, then he is really the maniac, and the mafia will kill him tonight.
And that's it: their guaranteed win.
Bravo, excellent plan.
I'm sure Spir also had a hand in this.