Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It differs from the ones you mentioned. In this case, I was only talking about the eroticism and impracticality of the clothing, and it doesn't matter at all whether it's a breastplate or the clothing on that elf, the clothing will still remain erotic and impractical for the elf's work. That's why I simply wrote the first name that came to mind – breastplate, because I don't know what her clothing is called, and I wrote it precisely because the essence in this case will not change. It would change if, well, I don't know, we were talking about the weight of the clothing, or, I don't know, about the sunlight reflecting off it or the clinking sound, then a breastplate is a breastplate because it's armor, and her clothing is her clothing because it has completely different properties.
Added after 56 seconds
And what is the evidence for this statement?
I don't understand why this needs to be proven, but I still wrote it out. Besides, Plesen definitely described everything, what I write in a few sentences