Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
If you had responded normally to a normal message, I would have reconsidered my words and accepted the fact that I might actually be wrong here. Deep down, I would still remain true to my memory, rather than to some half-baked, dubious posts from a person who changes their opinions like gloves. But this:
however, you had to find something to criticize, you wrote that you don't remember it, literally accusing me of writing about something that didn't actually happen, that is, lying
and this:
The fact that that game was quite difficult and lacked roles without non-player characters in no way contradicts my opinion that the game should have been simplified. I may have one opinion on the issue as a whole, but I may do things differently, based on other goals.
is a completely different matter. If you blew five neutral words out of proportion and even thought that you were being accused of one of the deadly sins and sentenced, then words have some meaning. And indeed, the second quote from these two helped to understand what was going on. It doesn't matter what games you play and what guides you when thinking about roles; it doesn't matter what you say here and there without quoting – in reality, everything is completely different from what it seems, and proof of this is one statement out of ten, located in the middle; a post inspired by an obvious overdoing of difficulty in a private game. Someone might call this inconsistency, which is certainly a shameful thing, worthy of reproach, and it's no wonder that you need to avoid even the most indirect accusations of it from anyone; someone might call it multiple standards, but since everything external is just a facade, and the real essence is hidden inside from prying eyes, that very core, the ultimate opinion that a person has always had, and to which one can always refer as a standard to defend against alleged attacks, then yes, in this case I was wrong and I apologize for accusing you of lying with my careless words; I passed a harsh sentence of public condemnation. Next time, when I talk to you, I will be more careful and will carefully weigh every word so as not to accidentally hurt you with seemingly harmless statements.