Mafia: general discussions.

In that case, were the second and third paragraphs from post #3365, the second half of the sentence in the second paragraph, if we are being extremely precise, completely fabricated? Will you deny this? Will you write "I once said something, I once wrote something"?

I didn't quite understand this part of the post, but never mind, I'll skim through post 3365.

Of course, this is a wonderful position – to demand quotes from dozens and dozens of pages ago, because, as we both well understand, no one will spend three hours digging them up, which means this can serve as a trump card so that people "could not possibly doubt the truth of the words."

What started the current discussion?
I wrote a post with a suggestion to conduct a rather complex game, but I also added that

A few months ago, I already wrote that it would be good to slightly reduce the difficulty of the games.

It's an ordinary, unremarkable message in essence, however, you absolutely had to find something to criticize, you wrote that you don't remember that, literally accusing me of writing about something that didn't actually happen, that is, lying.

I'll say it again about what I said before – the game needs to be simplified. Fewer non-displayed actions, remove the notes. This time, the roles and features were great, but again – executions based on notes, transparent roles based on the same notes and moves in the newspaper.

Unlike you, I didn't take a wonderful position, claiming that searching for old messages is not a noble thing to do and no one will do it, but I quoted my own post, which I had mentioned before, confirming my words. You continue to babble about something, without providing proof (by the way, this also applies to the second paragraph of your message). What else could be unclear? Everything is perfectly clear.

It is for this reason, by the way, that you hardly did any non-displayed actions in the twenty-first game, not to mention the fact that there was no role at all without non-displayed actions. And you personally wrote that.

The fact that that game was quite complex and there were no roles without non-displayed actions does not contradict my opinion that the game should be simplified. I may have one opinion on the issue as a whole, but I may do things differently, based on other goals. The essence remains the same in any case – I did not express support for making games more difficult.