Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
This suggests that if there were a reason for chess players to be restricted, it would have been done. But since there isn't, it's pointless because it simply won't affect the game. This is because they have everything in their memory, while we can't hold everything, so we need to prove everything in the game, rather than spending a week thinking about it. Moreover, studying psychology easily leads to the most elementary conclusion: allow breaking saves in free time, and they will break them on other days too! People are very interested, and the natural urge and interest always take precedence over restrictions. Moreover, it seems obvious to me – it's just a way to encourage cheating. Therefore, restoring the game state should only be allowed during the game.
How does it bother you to restore the lost game state when connecting with an opponent?
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...