Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Sometimes, it's harder to properly protect the ranged units in the lower row and the main stack with level 1 units, as the lower units hinder the movement of the upper ones. Rampart is a prime example of this.
Please, rephrase it more clearly. Medium_HP
It's usually easier to lure neutral "topters" downwards, as the upper units hinder the movement of the lower ones, and overall, they crawl slower.
Sorry for the lack of clarity - how do they hinder? With their bodies? Лось
I'm sure it's easier to maneuver ranged units when they're positioned above. My experience confirms this.
I suspected something similar and started this poll. Share specific examples, please! Javdet
I saw a very cool move from Alex - for example, when defending a castle, separate a level 1 unit from the ranged unit so that it's easier to move the "topters."
Probably, "move"? Maneuver them across the field, if there aren't any fast level 1 units for this purpose? Лось
The point is that a two-cell griffin + works even better with ranged units.
Oops, how did we miss this in development? I tried to test this a long time ago, and I remember that it made no difference. Tell me in detail - how does this manifest, and what else does it depend on? I'm sure many, if not all, will be interested.