Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
- Comparison of creatures from Heroes 5 with creatures in Heroes 3.
I don't dispute this argument, that is, the state of the market and the current trends, but... every era has its own trends, and any product is created taking this into account. In the time of King's Bounty, there was its own market, its own technology (much more limited than now), but the gameplay is still impressive. So, does the development of technology negate the brilliance of strategic thinking? I don't think so. If the technology is now much better than it was then, then the games, in theory, should be better than King's Bounty, not only in terms of graphics, but also in terms of improving the gameplay. Otherwise, it turns out that the simpler it is, the more ingenious it is.
Настоящие герои - не те, пред кем мы преклоняемся, а те, кого мы оплевываем...[/COLOR] ----------------------------- "So much has gone and little is new"