Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
What are the advantages of Heroes V? How do you see them?
The initial setup (in the Nival implementation) does not help in identifying a sensible player.
If a player makes a mistake when distributing units and fails to consider the possibility of my attack (doesn't conduct reconnaissance), then they should DIE in a BLOODY SLAUGHTER. The army should be completely wiped out, and the commander burned at the stake:D
There should be a price for mistakes. In chess, you don't rearrange pieces before a decisive attack.
Currently, in Heroes 5, there is no difference between an attacking and a defending army – this is nonsense. There shouldn't be equal conditions. Whoever attacks gets to decide and arrange things. And the other should wait for their fate. They have a chance to correct their mistake in battle. But before the battle, there is no need to give them that chance.