Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Perhaps not everyone is interested in developing a Necromancer, and there are other topics to discuss?
I'll try to develop Anastasia in the campaign in this way. I'm not sure, but I think that in a duel, where losses are inevitable, "Sacrifice" will be more useful. In the "Sign of the Necromancer" campaign, with a 20% bonus to attack spells, it looks better, considering the small number of troops at the beginning of the missions and the powerful magical strength of the campaign heroes.
By the way, it's also interesting that when I played against a Necromancer who used "Sacrifice," I didn't deal any damage to his troops - for some reason, the 67% damage didn't transfer to the sacrificing unit, and the attacks simply disappeared. All that remained was to attack the sacrificing unit itself and shoot.