Dialogues with Moderators

If you can't tell the difference between trolling and something else, then it just reflects poorly on you.

If after this statement someone still considers you a reasonable moderator, then perhaps you should provide links to relevant posts:
OH MY GOD, IT’S TROLLING
/topic/at/508404/
/topic/at/508695/
/topic/at/508112/
/topic/at/508101/
/topic/at/509217/
/topic/at/508173/
/topic/at/508731/
And of course, the highlight of the show, a blatant insult:
/topic/at/508522/

You apparently don't quite understand the meaning of the word "trolling" on the internet; if someone teases or says that someone is wrong, it doesn't mean that everyone suddenly becomes a TROLL and comes to destroy ХВ and humiliate everyone.
You acted inappropriately, were guided by personal motives, personal dislike, and your own sense of self-importance. You were pointed out about this – you started giving points to everyone for trolling and insults.
You also didn’t take responsibility for your words, constantly referring to the Creator.
Double standards, what can you do? Especially considering that there is no less trolling on your part, and most of your actions as a moderator can be characterized as trolling and insults.

And who among those who received points would agree that they deserved them? Thus, the point of explaining to the user where he violated the rules is lost.

It wouldn't be so bad, but you are the one assigning these points unfairly, and EVERYONE agrees with this.