Mafia: general discussions.

Well, judging by the latest posts, yes, that's the impression I get.

But we'll keep our speculations to ourselves, right? Okay, let's discuss it.

Proof of what? Proof of my post from the previous page?

Proof that your post says the same thing. It's obvious.

If you compare the time spent analyzing the newspaper with the information obtained from it, then everyone here is a genius and an Einstein.

That's an exaggerated point of view. If a person has minimal understanding, they won't be able to analyze it even if they spend 40 hours.

Everyone has their own fun; some grind characters to dominate, some just play, some donate two hundred thousand rubles and also dominate, getting their fun. The one who dominates everyone is very smart, right?

The comparison with PvP is silly. Completely different mechanics. + In Mafia, you can't buy brains with donations.

The video is, of course, mediocre, but let's go.

Okay.
In the first few seconds, he uses the cannon, flies into the sky, and hovers there for half the match, filming the little people running around on the ground from the same cannon to maintain flight and maneuver, or using a crossbow. That's the strategy. Only 2 weapons are actually used - the cannon and the crossbow. The rest of the weapons are only used for fun.
They all know the respawn points and can eliminate a revived player in a millisecond from some special angle at the slightest sound.
And they constantly demonstrate knowledge of all the features and repeat them until they succeed.

I'm not saying that there's no skill in Half-Life and that you don't need a brain to play, but it requires an order of magnitude less skill than in Mafia.

Added 12 minutes ago

As far as I remember, in game 31, you let the team down, and not just once (And even though this happened, no one called you a noob or a loser, although they could have, but they didn't).

Let's not talk about game 31, okay? Otherwise, I'll upset Wissy again.

And in game 34, almost all of your conclusions were wrong. But no, you didn't admit your mistake, but instead, as always, resorted to the classic accusation of "noobs and losers."

Lol, what? In game 34, I admitted my mistake. But it was dictated by the circumstances, because in that situation, there was no better option. I wrote to you in the thread more than once about the mistakes that prompted me to make incorrect conclusions, and I mentioned the other reasons for my mistakes. What's wrong?

For example, I don't particularly enjoy playing in such an environment.
If a person plays poorly, it doesn't mean that they should be constantly reminded of it or labeled an "imbecile." People play however they want, and no one owes anyone anything.

If a person doesn't want to play well and doesn't want to learn to play well, I don't enjoy the game. Well, you know, it's a naive dream - every player shares smart thoughts, there are calm discussions, long-term plans are devised, and elaborate schemes are carried out. But that's not the case, and it's not expected to happen. And therefore, in the absence of my own fun, I am free to do whatever I want within the rules. I constructively criticize, and I also stir up negativity. Problem? Sue me.