L**A
Auto-translated
I was wrong about the pikemen, I admit. But Archangels are still stronger than black dragons, or at least equal. And that's only because black dragons are immune to magic.
QUOTE]
Only? :confused: :D Maybe that's one of their features? Let's remove the "double" attack from the Crusaders, the double shot from the Archers, the bonus from the Cavaliers, etc.!
Added after 1 minuteRokete;19467I was wrong about the pikemen, I admit. But Archangels are still stronger than black dragons, or at least equal. And that's only because black dragons are immune to magic.
And the Nagas are significantly weaker than the Cavaliers. Royal Nagas are weaker than Champions.
Only? Maybe that's one of their features?:confused: Let's remove the "double" attack from the Crusaders, the double shot from the Archers, the bonus from the Cavaliers, etc.! :D
Added after 13 minutes
Apparently, they're somewhere, but they're hiding! And the pikemen are still the strongest because we're considering hand-to-hand combat.
"considering hand-to-hand combat" - but why? I think that's not right.
We took and compared level 1 creatures - with all their advantages!
The Crusaders may have more health, but while they're getting to the Goblins, the Goblins will give them a hard time! ::) But I'm not sure who will win. Because, for comparison, if we take 10 upgraded Goblins, we need to take 10 upgraded Pikemen. The Goblins will give them a hard time, but eventually, the Pikemen will get there :D We need to look at it.