Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
So, given the heated discussions that have already arisen in several threads on this topic, I think it's necessary to create this poll. I suggest you express your opinion about "Quick Battle" (commonly known as autobattle, enabled in the settings) in this thread.
Let's simulate a situation. You have a huge army, 10+ archangels, 150+ archers. There are many neutral melee units around, and the danger is "minor." Will you clear them all manually, or will you save time for a major battle?
Now, let's consider the drawbacks. The first is a partial loss of atmosphere. Therefore, it's naturally boring to fight every battle on autobattle. But if we take into account the second drawback, which is that the experience gained as a result of autobattle does not contribute to dynasty experience, we can draw the following conclusion: major battles with significant neutral forces (4000 experience, for example), even if without losses, should be fought manually. Then, the experience will go towards your dynasty, and you won't feel ashamed for not fighting "like a hero."