Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
You should read the entire post carefully. At the beginning, the Warrior doesn't need an army; it only serves as cannon fodder to capture something valuable. He breaks through everything with potions and his own strength. Therefore, he can easily move around without an army and still defeat a small mage's army, either in one go or in two.
The Warrior can move around without an army, but is it worth it?
As for mages, if they are not Chaos or Druid mages, they can't do much without an army, and even these two "independent" types require constant mana control.
Necromancers, I forgot, one of my friends really likes to summon 1,000 skeletons at a time.
Eventually, the Warrior also needs to build an army, which is logical. But with only attack and defense bonuses, his army won't go far in a battle against a mage. Without Dispel, it's better to surrender immediately.
The goal is to quickly eliminate the mage, and then dealing with the army will be easy.