Heroes of sword or magic?

But doesn't a warrior go around alone and without an army? No, I actually like answers like that.

You should read the whole post carefully. At the beginning, the warrior doesn't need an army; he just needs it as cannon fodder to capture something valuable. He breaks through everything with potions and his own strength. Therefore, he can easily go around without an army and still defeat a small mage's army, either in one go or in two. And mages, if they are not a Chaos or Druid mage, can't do much without an army, and even these two "independent" types require constant mana control. Later on, the warrior also needs to build an army, which is logical. But with only attack and defense bonuses, his army won't go far in a battle against a mage. Without dispel, you might as well surrender immediately.

And for a barbarian to get magic is a real pain, yes, I can learn Wisdom and Magic, but I'll never forget when I had 17 attack, 2 defense, 2 strength, and 1 knowledge. And after that, you tell me that a warrior will be equal to a mage in spells, and I'll laugh.

The thing is, the warrior will loot magic books, as well as artifacts for knowledge and strength, from the drowned