Мафия 32. Asylum

I won't say anything special right now, but the game turned out to be terrible. I don't blame the GM for this, although there were a ton of bugs; I don't blame Arandor, who did everything the way he wanted; I blame a couple of specific players for this. What the heck? Why should we play for the sake of the setting? I don't care about all your "non-standard" games! If you're so afraid of losing, don't play! And don't pretend that you did it for a beautiful ending; people here are smart, and everyone understands. And in general, how can we talk about honesty or honor in a game that is created to convincingly lie? In general, you disappointed me. However, there aren't many complaints about Hos, because from the very beginning he told me that he just wants a beautiful ending, but Gil... I didn't like how he literally spoke on behalf of the city and the psychos. At first, I thought he was suggesting a temporary alliance in which we get rid of the harmful docks, but in reality, as a player, I didn't like this action, especially when he suggested eliminating the maniac who wasn't harming his team at all (well, how can you not support it if we need to eliminate him ourselves?), and then I was sure that we would start opposing each other, where the winner would be one. However, instead, he started talking about all sorts of draws and "beautiful victories." But Arandor is right, a draw is not a victory. So why should we all go for this "beautiful victory" if, in the end, no one wins, and the maniac and the unfortunate evil doctors die? I also didn't like how Gil started making decisions for the city team, and don't say that none of the city residents were against it, or are you saying that Reinhardt is nobody? It was also wrong that Hos decided everything for us, although at the end of the game he still asked what we wanted (yes, we could have gone to kill tonight if we hadn't been too lazy to continue). Gil, I have nothing against you, or against your plans (although I don't think I've ever really followed them), but still, stop shining with your self-importance and making decisions for others. Also, don't be so sure of your conclusions, because you can also be wrong, for example, in the last game you defended the mafia elephant (and you're even proud of it! =\). And if you figured everything out correctly, that doesn't mean that everyone else knows all the roles; not everyone can read between the lines (I usually only intuitively guess other people's roles, and even then, mostly alone, and I'm not always sure, because we all make mistakes). In general, please stop taking everything on yourself, as if winning this game determines our future, and yes, stop turning normal games into "non-standard" ones; it's not interesting to anyone anyway. Revanka is great; he played the best in this game. I even thought of him as Patrick on the first day (seriously!), but I didn't develop this thought, but that's a good thing, because otherwise your role wouldn't have been so useful, and the efforts would have been meaningless. I liked Lorelei; I didn't expect him to be such an interesting player; in general, his debut was successful. Amko is also cute, but I think he didn't care as much as I did. And Hostor is great; on the first night, he suggested good checks and quickly realized that Gil was just a guard. Only we were exposed terribly ~_~. In general, we had a good team; I liked it. Vistrit pleased me, especially with his "nyanyanyanya," because it really was like that! And Nebko was also funny, even though he was exposed. Arandor is the moderator, but sometimes he was right; it's a pity that we had to kill him so quickly, because otherwise the game might have been more fun. I have nothing to say to the others, except to thank them for the worst game ever. A special thank you to Slonyash, for the interesting setting in general and the good newspapers; honestly, it was very interesting to read; the plot was very well thought out, in my opinion. However, never give anyone immunities out of favor again, because that's not right, and it's not fair, and players will be angry.

Added 10 minutes ago
Arandor also said something here that we and Gil had agreed in the chat. Personally, I don't know if that was the case with him and Hostor, but if it was, the team was unaware. However, I have no doubt that Hostor and Gil are not jerks and played fairly, agreeing in the topic with their secret codes, which is not forbidden; otherwise, they would be jerks.