In the first case, it was understood as you wanted it to be. But, well, let it be. I'm systematically undermining the agreement, but I really don't trust it because you can't expect transparency from psychos. But on the other hand, I'm not telling the psychos to go and kill everyone.
And what, are you already revealing your role?
I'm trying to bring today's execution of Gil to a conclusion and prove to the town that it's a beneficial case from a statistical point of view. But, as always, initiative is punished.
And where am I revealing my role? If you portray me as not a Guardian, that's a fact. Independent of who I am.
Statistics? That's funny.
Added 3 minutes later
I don't care, as I said, you can execute me. I always openly propose a candidate and defend my position.



