Gil4
Auto-translated
1. There are two worlds and two Mafia members left. Of course, artistic flourishes are artistic flourishes, but I think the newspaper clearly states that the Knight was aiming at his target.
Conclusion - Elephant is either the Seer or the Dancer.
2. Plus, if Thorius is the Advisor, then Elephant has a chance of being only a Golem. If Thorius was the Duke and Elephant was the Advisor, she cannot be sent to jail. If Elephant is a Golem, an angel will rescue her.
It's not a certainty, but it's interesting - "Sacred Fury" is the name of the newspaper, and it's a meaningful name.
3. What's been happening in the last twenty pages of the thread? In the last twenty pages, the votes are being scattered between the first candidate for execution - Elephant - and a randomly chosen Gil Nairy. The justification for executing Nairy is: "the Mafia used the note cancellation to prevent the Alchemist from reporting that she is a non-town role (despite the presence of three non-town town roles)", and "the Mafia blocked themselves".
4. Now, Gil has lost some momentum because he hasn't provided any arguments other than "trust my intuition", and out of spite, he has shifted his vote to Arandor, presumably to further scatter the votes or in the hope of a pattern typical of a town player: "execute Arandor".
5. What does Gil propose in the end? He proposes "risking" a non-suspicious player "to cover the roles", suggesting that we leave the presumed Elephant-Dancer, "because we know her and will block her if necessary", and the Elephant-Dancer goes first, and on the next night, she uses the Half-Moon Dance, and thus:
- we will hang a completely random player today, probably a town member;
- we will get another kill from the Mafia at night, or even two from the Knight;
- we will not be able to hang anyone at all the next day;
- we lose.
1. The town should not reveal a player's role in ANY way. The fact that you don't understand this and keep insisting on it makes me think. You've played before.
2. Blah-blah-blah, we're not risking anything except wasting a day and losing. I'm tired of repeating this.
And what thoughts did the name give you? Give me a specific interpretation.
3. Am I the only one who voted for Nairy, and that's scattering the votes? No one supported me; it looks very much like a Mafia leak, yes. And you're just watching, but you don't see.
4. Yes, that's how it was, out of spite. <- Sarcasm, if that's not clear.
I can't comment here without revealing the meaning of my actions.
5. You're writing with the assumption that some people are too lazy to read. I was especially amused by the part about the block! What a masterpiece! I NEVER said that we would be able to block her! You came up with that on the fly; I've just been saying that she's a TOWN member. The fact that you're inventing my supposed phrases is killing me.
You're looking at the situation too narrowly, very narrowly. Again, with the assumption that some people are lazy.
Here's how you can look at this situation from a different angle:
1. We execute Elephant.
2. We reveal her role to the Mafia so they know who to kill.
3. We waste a day.
4. We lose as a result of the fact that a wasted execution now ALREADY leads to a loss.
Added 2 minutes ago
And yes, I don't think the Mafia can win as long as the town has a Knight who can kill.
Do you want to free Nebko? Go ahead. Go ahead. Prove your role. He's still without a companion, and he won't interfere with us, and the Governor can use Military Command. Go ahead, Lucifer.
Even if we fight, even if there’s such thing
I will not give up
Just like this, I won't let go
Strongly grasping your right hand’s warmth
I’ll be here
