Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Are we robots that need to be activated? Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Okay, okay, seriously now. I was just about to write you all off as terminators, haha.
I didn't exaggerate anything; I just showed that by executing the Archer, we might miss out on mana, but by executing the Mana, we can reduce nighttime losses to no more than one and achieve 100% execution during the day. That's an objective assessment.
Boo, they won't let me complain. It just said that we definitely won't be able to execute the Mana anymore, when in reality, the probability of that is 1/10 – killing the governor, 1/2 – execution without him, totaling 95% success.
Dear GMs, let's all raise our hands, who gave one clue out of two parts, with two elements of the profile! ^_^
Yeah, and let's also have the elders consult on who to burn at the stake so that the fields will yield a rich harvest. Seriously, it's ridiculous. Each GM acts in their own way; for example, Zubr gave a clue based on the number of birds. So, referring to the fact that it wasn't done that way before is, at the very least, absurd and indicates a lack of critical thinking.
Added 1 minute ago What's the status on the votes?