Sacred Haven of Debauchery

As I understood from that previous discussion, your position is that Creation is above meaning and cannot be meaningful or meaningless, am I right?

Wow! It finally happened. This is exactly what I meant. This, and nothing else. The rest is not my business; it might be foolish, it might be clever, I haven't read the text and haven't delved into anything. But nevertheless, whether "providing a brief, poor-quality summary, and not of the entire work, but only a part of it" is foolish is a subjective assessment. In my opinion, it's no more foolish than anything else – it correlates with the title and meaning of the topic. Any further whining from Imaris is even more foolish.
Citing two posts out of seven hundred, written consecutively in a short period of time, is not the strongest evidence of "every other post" or "every other word."

Added 7 minutes later
What's going on? I express something categorical, and they jump on me and say, "ololol calls everything he doesn't like garbage."
I express something completely non-categorical, and I'm accused of "ololol, being evasive, playing with words, an attempt at objectivity, which is not needed."
You can't please you.