R55Max
Auto-translated
I tested the towers. Castle vs. Rampart (it doesn't really matter which). Each of us has probably noticed that towers attack with different strength, but we don't know why yet (maybe someone knows). In general, I tested the following options:
1. Hero with ranged attack defends.
2. Hero without ranged attack defends.
3. Battle without a garrison hero.
4. I personally adhered to the myth that the earlier the towers are built, the stronger they become each week, but after building in 3 castles on different weeks (1, 2, 3), I didn't see any difference.
5. Attacked and defended with heroes with ranged attack and ballistics - no changes.
I didn't test battles with a hero who has the "War Machine" skill.
And from the above, it follows that all towers on any week attack with the same strength! (regardless of whether there is a garrison hero): the main tower deals 30-45 damage, the side towers 15-30 HP.
But there is also a moment when the towers deal a lot of damage.
What do you think?
1. Hero with ranged attack defends.
2. Hero without ranged attack defends.
3. Battle without a garrison hero.
4. I personally adhered to the myth that the earlier the towers are built, the stronger they become each week, but after building in 3 castles on different weeks (1, 2, 3), I didn't see any difference.
5. Attacked and defended with heroes with ranged attack and ballistics - no changes.
I didn't test battles with a hero who has the "War Machine" skill.
And from the above, it follows that all towers on any week attack with the same strength! (regardless of whether there is a garrison hero): the main tower deals 30-45 damage, the side towers 15-30 HP.
But there is also a moment when the towers deal a lot of damage.
What do you think?
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...