Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Pairing participants is highly subjective, in my opinion, because it doesn't take into account the difference between the winner and the loser. For example:
1st pair: 3rd place/20th place
2nd pair: 18th place/15th place
Based on points, it will be 1-1. And what, would you say, are the teams equal?...
Switch the players and it will be 2:0 with the same results.
Pairing makes sense only when considering a "weight category," but we only have one.
Therefore, it is better to consider the average of the sum of each team's results...