Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Oh, for crying out loud, here we go again with the genre debates. The whole system of genres, subgenres, and pseudo-genres is essentially flawed. It's like the classification system in biology: a real, natural (based on origin) system of organisms exists in a formal sense (in nature, animals don't divide themselves into classes, orders, or families), but no one has developed it, and it's unlikely anyone will. All human-created systems are, to some extent, artificial.
And yes, most metal (and not just metal) bands don't bother thinking, "Let's create some post-black-death-neo-classical-progressive-hardcore metal; that'll be cool!" All those composite names are just templates for journalists to use when they ask the standard question, "How would you describe your genre?"
To avoid going off-topic, here's a relevant clip. The overall idea isn't particularly original, but the presentation is impressive. And the music is for those who are tired of standard metal/punk/"alternative" (choose as appropriate).