Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
What was the point of saying that? I already know that not everyone has the same weapon.
And am I denying that it's not only used by cavalry? I'm just clarifying what it was originally created for.
Firstly, it's a clarification. Secondly, it's accurate.
That's why I said:Ple-Sen
This is, actually, an adaptation of a hand-and-a-half sword for mounted knights.
I understood that you're claiming that a hand-and-a-half sword is a cavalry sword and, like a lance, it wasn't used by anyone other than cavalry. The emphasis on "actually" reinforces the correcting tone, in my humble opinion. If I'm wrong, I apologize:rolleyes:.
Arandor
Omega, it's already difficult for people to choose.
Come on. We once conducted a comprehensive (well, at least a large) poll on one site, and only fans of exotic weapons chose them, while the majority still voted for swords, axes, and bows, because this is the most popular trio, and no trendy katana can surpass them.
Reinhard
But there are five times fewer people voting in polls.
But isn't that a reason to remove the choice for those who are voting? (elections in our country don't count ;) )