Oelm
Auto-translated
1. The popularity of Tyraxor has led to the fact that you can play with him without really thinking. The main difference with Shahti is that, to put it bluntly, the Dungeon castle is just bad on its own and only becomes viable thanks to the starting hero. In the case of the Barbarians, things are different.
By the way, I'd like to draw attention to Dirty's suggestion.
2. I will continue to defend my opinion about the Armorers. On HL templates, I will take Brogh even if he's nerfed because I highly value scouting. A nerfed Thazar, in my opinion, looks even worse than Alkin, which simply means pushing the hero into the background.
3. I am all for bringing back scrolls, but does this conflict with the concept of Warlord - saving players' real time?
4. With the disappearance of the Explorer, shouldn't we consider increasing the bonus of artifacts on MP?
By the way, I'd like to draw attention to Dirty's suggestion.
2. I will continue to defend my opinion about the Armorers. On HL templates, I will take Brogh even if he's nerfed because I highly value scouting. A nerfed Thazar, in my opinion, looks even worse than Alkin, which simply means pushing the hero into the background.
3. I am all for bringing back scrolls, but does this conflict with the concept of Warlord - saving players' real time?
4. With the disappearance of the Explorer, shouldn't we consider increasing the bonus of artifacts on MP?
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.