a.i.m.
Auto-translated
I'm not a big fan of playing as dwarves, but I'll still share my thoughts.
1) The old upgrade is great. Shield Wall, no comment.
2) Also, the old Crippling Strike is better. And both archers are weak, as someone already mentioned, so the difference in damage doesn't really matter.
3) The old paw attack definitely works almost every time, and it's also good against archers. After the knockback, I often managed to position the bears in front of the archers.
4) I don't use them often, but if I do, I prefer the new one because it's tougher.
5) I choose the alternate upgrade because my games as dwarves don't usually last long.
6) I take Jarls. The initiative of 1 is a plus, and if it's against neutrals, the 2 damage of the Jarls is compensated for.
7) The old one has more health, and the fire wall isn't really needed. And they nerfed the fire breath, which was a shame. =(
1) The old upgrade is great. Shield Wall, no comment.
2) Also, the old Crippling Strike is better. And both archers are weak, as someone already mentioned, so the difference in damage doesn't really matter.
3) The old paw attack definitely works almost every time, and it's also good against archers. After the knockback, I often managed to position the bears in front of the archers.
4) I don't use them often, but if I do, I prefer the new one because it's tougher.
5) I choose the alternate upgrade because my games as dwarves don't usually last long.
6) I take Jarls. The initiative of 1 is a plus, and if it's against neutrals, the 2 damage of the Jarls is compensated for.
7) The old one has more health, and the fire wall isn't really needed. And they nerfed the fire breath, which was a shame. =(