Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
By the way, I said that almost in passing, just as an association. And Ayves is defending him so fervently that it's almost amusing.
Again, a couple of posts and immediately, it's all zealous and fierce.
So, here's the thing. Now that Gur has finally appeared and his kill has been thwarted, I can vote for him on suspicion of being an antichrist based on an interestingly interpreted clue. But it would be foolish to ignore Vishmaster. It can't be said that poisoning was one of the official mafia night actions, since both occult night actions are clearly visible - Vistrit's block and the killing of Slonysh. The thief robbed Vishmaster, promised to come to the person, and used what he had - poison. In a way, we got lucky, as two killings merged into one person. The question is - who to execute? In the first case, we have a clue, in the second - a night action. In the first case, if we didn't misinterpret the clue, we will reduce the number of demon worshippers to one person, which will generally give the occultists a greater advantage and a better chance to strike at the town. In the second case, we will disperse the intensity of getting rid of the scum.
I like the version with the theft night action more. There is always a chance that the clue was misinterpreted.